<p>Besides, the author tended to assume that freedom of press could become a negative phenomenon in the life of society. These assumptions are surprising for us, who are used to freedom of press and freedom of speech, but Tocqueville’s work should be analyzed in order to understand, in what state the freedom of press is currently found. ” (Tocqueville, 2006) Tocqueville did not conceal his attitudes towards the freedom of the press: he supposed that freedom of press could potentially produce political evils, but simultaneously, he also tried to be objective in evaluating the state of freedom of press in the two countries - the United States and France. Freedom of press should be considered in the light of the assumption, that press is the embodiment, and the means of expressing certain ideas. Press is the means of transferring the ideas to the masses, and the language is the instrument to convey these ideas to the public. It is relevant to state, and Tocqueville recognized this conflict, and no matter how negative or positive freedom of press could be, it did not impact the state of political affairs in the country. This content was written with https://essayfreelancewriters.comversion!</p><br /><br /><br /><br /><p>This may sound rather contradictory, but the author provides us with a very clear explanation of the subject: he refers to language as “the mere carcass of the thought”. Consequentially, the press becomes the mere form for expressing the ideas of certain political circles. ” . Even in the case censorship is established the word of public in Tocqueville’s understanding will be heard. In the attempt to objectively evaluate the state of press and its freedom in the world, Tocqueville refers to specific reasons of why some nations simply have to cherish freedom of press: among the major reasons the author discusses the liberty of press as the only source of justice in the countries, where judicial system lacks sound laws to prosecute those who violate laws, possessing legal impunity . In the case with the United States, the freedom of press is the direct consequence of the individual sovereignty, which American citizens exercise. <i>This content has been written with the help of Essay Writers !</i></p><br /><br /><p>In the political and legal environment, in which the U. S. citizens do exist, it would be not only inappropriate, but absolutely absurd to adopt the measures of informational censorship . Tocqueville determines the political situation in France and America in the similar revolutionary terms, acknowledging the fact that America did not possess a single germ of revolution, while the roots of the press and freedom of press development in France were mainly found in the social instability, through which that country had to go during that time. The freedom of press in both countries led to the situation, when it was already formed as a singular power, combining both goods and evils. How Has Idea Of Freedom Changed In America - Essay - 1441 Words described in Tocqueville’s work was really similar to that we face today: the freedom of press makes this press almost incompatible with that we call social and political order. Probably, Tocqueville was very predictive and could foresee that the freedom of press could potentially produce public disorder, but in any case he was very objective, recognizing the power of press in the United States.</p><br /><br /><p>“In France the press combined a twofold centralization; almost all its power is centred in the same spot, and vested in the same hands, for its organs are far from numerous. “In Bumper Stickers And Road Rage was trying to express the basic statements of what we currently call “ownership” in press . On the contrary, the American nation did not possess any centralized control over its press, which has become the direct consequence of the freedom of press in that country. According to Tocqueville, America was initially keeping to the opinion, that the more journals it published, the more neutralized would be their effect on the public. However, Americans' Freedom To Choose witness are different from the way the author wanted to position them. The numerous publications are certainly the expression of the freedom of press, but they also tend to produce the clash of opinions, social attitudes and even disorders in the attempt to gain more economic profits. The press has turned to be the mere marketplace of ideas, which is the major discrepancy between the press now and the press then.</p><br />